IX.Civics.Chapter2.What is Democracy Why Democracy
Raman's Classes
Chapter 2.What is Democracy. Why Democracy?
Chapter 2.What is Democracy. Why Democracy?
Day1.Period 1.Page 22-23.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Terms
Persons.
Understandings Page 22.
Persons.
Understandings Page 22.
Overview.
The stories and the analysis in the previous chapter gave us a sense of what democracy is like. There we described same governments as democratic and some as non democratic. We saw how governments in some of those countries changed from to the other. Let us now draw general lessons from those stories and ask the more
basic question.
What is democracy?
What are its features ? This chapter builds on a simple definition of a democracy. Step by step we work out the meaning of the terms involved in this definition. The aim here is to understand clearly the bare minimum features of a democratic form of government. After going through this chapter we should be able to distinguish a democratic form of government from a nondemocratic government. Towards the end of the chapter, we step beyond this minimal objective and introduce a broader idea of democracy.
In this previous chapter ,we have seen that democracy is the most prevalent form of government in the world today and it is expanding to more countries. But why is it so? What makes it better than other forms of government? That is the second big question that we take up in this chapter
Understandings Page 23.
2.1 What is Democracy ?
In Chapter One we read many stories from different parts of the world Through these stories we discussed various governments and organisations. We called some of these democracies. Can you recall, for each of these countries, something about the governments
that were described as democracies?
Chile, before and after Pinochet's Democratic governments rule
Poland, after the fall of communist rule
Why define democracy?
Ghana, in the early period of Nkrumah's government what do you think is common to them?
the label of democracy? Why do we club them all under the label of democracy ?
What is it distinguishes these governments from Pinochet's rule in Chile, communist rule in Poland or the later period of Nkrumah's rule in Ghana? What do there governments have in others were common with the military rule in Mayanmar ? on the basis of this analysis, write down some common features of
Democratic governments
Non - democratic governments
Why define democracy?
before we proceed further, let us first take note of an objection by Merry. She does not like this way defining democracy to ask some basic questions.
News items like this appear very often in newspapers. Do they all use the word democracy in the same sense.
Home Assignment.
a. Attempt the inside Questions/Answers
b. Understand by your own.
c. Learn them.
d. Keep eyes over figure.
---------------------
Chapter 2.What is Democracy.Why Democracy?
Day2.Period 2.Page 24-25.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Terms
Persons.
Understandings Page 24.
Persons.
Understandings Page 24.
Her teacher Matild Lyngdon responds to her questions, as
other classmates join the discussion
Marry : Ma'am, I don't like this idea First we spend on wide chapter discussing democracies in different parts of the world and then we want to find out the meaning of democracy. I mean logically shouldn't we have approached it the other way round? Shouldn't the meaning have come first and then the example
Marry : Ma'am, I don't like this idea First we spend on wide chapter discussing democracies in different parts of the world and then we want to find out the meaning of democracy. I mean logically shouldn't we have approached it the other way round? Shouldn't the meaning have come first and then the example
Lyngdoh Madam : I
can see your point. But that is not how we
reason is everyday life. We use words like pen,
rain or love. Do we want to have
definition of these words before we use them. Come to think of it do we have clear definition of these
words? It is only by using a word that
we understand its meaning
Merry : But then why do we need definitions at all?
Lyngdoh Madan : We need a definition only when
we come across a difficulty in the use of a word. We need a definition of rain
only when we wish to distinguish it from, say, drizzle or cloudburst. The same is
true for democracy. We need a clear definition only because people use for different purposes, because very different kinds
of governments call themselves democracy.
Ribiang : But why do we need to work on
a definition? The other day you quoted
Abraham Lin coin to us "Democracy is a rule of the people, for the people
and by the people'. We in Meghalaya always ruled themselves. That is accepted
by everyone. Why do we need to change that?
Lyngdoh Madam I am not saying we need to change it. I too
find this definition very beautiful. But we don't know if this is the best way
of defining unless we think about it ourselves. We must not accept something
just because it is famous, just because
everyone accepts it.
Yolanda : Ma'am, can I suggest something? We don't need to look
for any definition. I read somewhere that the word democracy comes from a Greek word
"Demokratia. In Greek 'demos means
people and "Kratia" means rule. So democracy is rule by the people.This is the correct meaning.
Where is the need to debate?
Lyngdoh Madam That is also a very helpful way of thinking about this
matter. I would just say that this does
not always work. A word does not remain tied to its origin. Just think of com puters. Originally they were used for computing that
is to say calculating, very difficult mathematical sums. These were very powerful calculators. But
nowadays very few people use computers for computing sums. They use it for writing, for designing, for
listening to music and for watching films.
Words remain the same but their meaning can change with time.In that case it is not very useful to look at
the origins of a word,
Merry : Ma'am, so basically what you are saying is that
there is no shortcut to our thinking about the matter ourselves. We have to think about its meaning and evolve
a definition Lyngdoh Madam You got me right.
Let us get on with it now
ACTIVITY
Let us take Lyngdoh Madam seriously
and try to write down the exact definition of some of the simple words that we
use all the time: pen, rain and love. For example, is there a way of defining a pen that distinguishes it
clearly from a pencil, a brush, a highlighter or a marker? What have you learnt from this attempt?
What does it teach us about understanding the
meaning of democracy?
A simple
definition
Let us get back to our discussion on similarities and differences
among governments that are called democracies.
In the last chapter we identified one simple factor common to all
democracies: the government is chosen by the people.
We could thus start with a simple definition
democracy is a form government in which the rulers of are elected by the people
This is a useful starting point. This
definition allows us to separate democracy from forms of
government that are clearly not democratic the army rulers of Myanmar are not elected by the people. Those who "happen to be in control of the army become the rulers of the country.
government that are clearly not democratic the army rulers of Myanmar are not elected by the people. Those who "happen to be in control of the army become the rulers of the country.
I have heard a different version Democracy is off the people,
far (from) the people and (where they) buy the people why don't we accept that?
Understandings Page 25.
become the rulers of the country People have no say in this
decision Dictators like Pinochet are not elected by the people. This also applies to monarchies. The king of Nepal and Saudi Arabia rule not
because the people have chosen them to do so but because they happen to be born
into the royal family.
This simple definition is not sufficient, it reminds us
that democracy is people rule. But if we use this definition in an unthinking manner, we would end up calling almost every government that holds an election a
democracy. That would be very
misleading. As we noted in Chapter Four,
every government in the contemporary world wants to be called a democracy, even
if it is not so.That is why we need to
carefully distinguish between a government that is a democracy and one that
pretends to be one. We can do so by
understanding each word in this definition carefully and spelling out the
features of a democratic government.
Check Your Progress.
Ribiang went back home and collected some
more famous quotations on democracy. This time she did not mention the names of
the people who said or wrote these. She
wants you to read these and comment on how good or useful these thoughts are
Democracy gives every man the right to be his own oppressor
Democracy consists
of choosing your dictators after they've told you what you think it is you want
to hear -
Man's capacity for justice makes
democracy possible, but man's inclination to injustice makes democracy
necessary
Democracy is a device that insures we will be governed no better than
we deserve
All the ills of democracy can be cured by more democracy
This cartoon was drawn when elections were held in Iraq with the presence of US and other foreign powers. What do you think this cartoon is saying ? Why is 'democracy' written the way it is.
Home Assignment.
a. Attempt the inside Questions/Answers
b. Understand by your own.
c. Learn them.
d. Keep eyes over figure.
e. Keep reading this chapter.
---------------------
Chapter 2.What is Democracy. Why Democracy?
Day3.Period 3.Page 26-27.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Terms
Persons.
Understandings Page 24.
Persons.
Understandings Page 24.
2.2 FEATURES OF DEMOCRACY We have started with a simple
definition that democracy is a form @) of government in which the rulers are
elected by the people. This raises many
questions:
Who are the rulers in this definition? Which officials must be elected for any
government to be called a democracy?
Which decisions may be taken by non elected officials in a
democracy? What kind of election
constitutes a democratic election? What
conditions must be fulfilled for an C election to be considered
democratic?
Who are the people who can
elect the rulers or get elected as rulers?
Should this include every citizen on an equal basis? Can a democracy deny some citizens this
right?
Finally, what kind of a form of
government is democracy? Can elected
rulers do whatever they want in a democracy?
Or must a democratic government function with some limits? Is it necessary for a democracy to respect
some rights of the citizens? Let us
consider each of these questions with the help of some examples.
Major decisions by elected leaders In
Pakistan, General Pervez Musharraf led a military coup in October 1999. He
overthrew a democratically elected government and declared himself the Chief
Executive 'of the country. Later he changed
his designation to President and in 2002 held a referendum in the country that
granted him a five year extension.
Pakistani media, f human right organizations and democracy activists
said that the y referendum was based onRead the Cartoon : Syria is a small west Asian country. The Ruling Baath party and some of its small allies are the only parties allowed in that country. Do you think this cartoon could apply to China or Maxico ? What does the crown of leaves on democracy signify.
Understandings Page 27.
malpractices and fraud. In August Order 2002 he issued a 'Legal Framework that amended the constitution of Pakistan. According to this order, the President can dismiss the national or provincial assemblies. The work of the civilian cabinet is supervised by a National Security Council which is dominated by military officers. After passing this law, elections were held to the national and state assemblies. So Pakistan has had elections, elected representatives have some powers. But the final power rests with military officers and General Musharraf himself.
malpractices and fraud. In August Order 2002 he issued a 'Legal Framework that amended the constitution of Pakistan. According to this order, the President can dismiss the national or provincial assemblies. The work of the civilian cabinet is supervised by a National Security Council which is dominated by military officers. After passing this law, elections were held to the national and state assemblies. So Pakistan has had elections, elected representatives have some powers. But the final power rests with military officers and General Musharraf himself.
Read the Cartoon This cartoon was drawn in the context of Latin America. Do you think it applies to the Pakistani situation as well? Think of other countries where they could apply? Does this happen sometimes in our country as well.
Clearly, there are many reasons
why Pakistan under General Musharraf should not be called a democracy. But let us focus on one of these. Can we say that the rulers are elected by the
people in Pakistan? Not quite. People may have elected their representatives
to the national and provincial assemblies but those elected representatives are
not really the
rulers. They cannot take the final decisions. The power to take final decision rests with army officers and with General Musharral, and none of them are elected by the people This happens in many dictatorships and monarchics. They formally have an clccted parliament and government but the real power is with those who are not elected. In the last chapter we read about the role of USSR in communist Poland and that of US in contemporary Iraq. Here the real power was with some external powers and not with locally elected representatives. This cannot be called people's rule.
rulers. They cannot take the final decisions. The power to take final decision rests with army officers and with General Musharral, and none of them are elected by the people This happens in many dictatorships and monarchics. They formally have an clccted parliament and government but the real power is with those who are not elected. In the last chapter we read about the role of USSR in communist Poland and that of US in contemporary Iraq. Here the real power was with some external powers and not with locally elected representatives. This cannot be called people's rule.
This gives us the first feature. In a democracy the final decision making
power must rest with those elected by the people.
Free and fair electoral competition In China,
elections are regularly held after every five years for electing the country's
parliament, called Quanguo Renmin Daibiao Dahui (National People's
Congress). The National People's
Congress has the power to appoint the President of the country. It has nearly 3,000 members elected from all
over China. Some members are elected by
the army. Before contesting elections, a
candidate needs the approval of the Chinese Communist Party. Only those who are members of the Chinese
Communist Party or eight smaller parties allied to it were allowed to contest
elections held in 2002-03. The
government is always formed by the Communist Party.
Since its independence in
1930, Mexico holds elections after every six years to elect its President. The country has never been under a military
or dictator's rule. But until 2000 every
election was won by a party called PRI ( Institutional Revolutionary Party)
Home Assignment.
a. Attempt the inside Questions/Answers
b. Understand by your own.
c. Learn them.
d. Keep eyes over figure.
e. Keep reading this chapter
-----------------
party called PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party). Opposition parties did contest elections, but
never managed to win, the PRI was known to use many dirty tricks to win
elections. All those who were employed
in government offices had to attend its party meetings. Teachers of government schools used to force
parents to vote for the PRI. Media
largely ignored the activities of oppositional political parties except to
criticize them. Sometimes the polling
booths were shifted from one place to another in the last minute, which made it
difficult for people to cast their votes.
The PRI spent a large sum of money in the campaign for its
candidates.
Read the Cartoon : This cartoon was titled ' Building Democracy' and was first published in a Latin American publication. What do moneybags signify here? Could this cartoon be applied in India.
Should we consider the elections
described above as examples of people electing their rulers? Reading these examples we get a sense that we
cannot. There are many problems
here. In China the elections do not
offer the people any serious choice.
They have to choose the ruling party and the candidates approved by
it. Can we call this a choice? In the Mexican example, people seemed to
really have a choice but in practice they had no choice. There was no way the ruling party could be
defeated, even if people were against it.
These are not fair elections. We
can thus add a second feature to our understanding of democracy. Holding elections of any kind is not
sufficient. The elections must offer a
real choice between political alternatives.
And it should be possible for people to use this choice to remove the
existing rulers, if they wish so. So, a
democracy must be based on a free and fair election where those currently in
power have a fair chance of losing. We
shall find out more about a democratic election in Chapter Four
One person, one vote, one value
One person, one vote, one value
In
the last chapter we read about how the struggle for democracy was linked to the
demand for universal adult franchise.
This principle has now come to be accepted almost all over the
world. Yet there are many instances of
denial of equal right to vote: In Saudi Arabia women do not have the right to
vote Estonia has made its citizenship rules in such a way that people belonging
to Russian minority find it difficult to get the right to vote in Fiji, the electoral system is such that the
vote of an indigenous Fiji has more value than that of an Indian - Fijian. Democracy is based on fundamental principle
of political equality. That gives us the
third feature of in democracy, each adult citizen must have one vote and each
vote must have one value. We shall read
more about it in Chapter Four.
Rule of law and respect for rights :
Read the Cartoon : The cartoon is about the Iraqi election held after Saddam Hussain's regime was overthrown. He is shown behind the bars. What is the cartoonist saying here? Compare the message of this cartoon with the first cartoon in this chapter.
Zimbabwe attained
independence from White minority rule in 1980.
Since then the country has been decided by ZANU - PF, the party that led
the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert
Mugabe, has been ruling the country since independence. Elections have been held regularly and always
won by ZANU - PF. President Mugabe is
popular but also uses unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government has changed the
constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him
less accountable. Opposition party
workers are harassed and their meeting disrupted. Public protests and demonstrations against
the government are declared illegal. There
is a law that limits the right to criticize the President. Television and radio are controlled by the
government and give only the ruling party's version, there are independent newspapers but the government
harasses those journalists who go against it.
The government has ignored some court judgments that went against it and
has pressurized judges. The example of
Zimbabwe shows that popular approval of the rulers is necessary in a democracy,
but it is not sufficient. Popular
governments can be undemocratic. Popular
leaders can be autocratic. If we wish to
assess a democracy, it is important to look at the elections. But it is equally important to look before
and after the elections. There should be
sufficient room for normal political activity, including political opposition,
in the period before elections. This
requires that the state should respect some basic rights of the citizen. They should be free to think, to have
opinions, to express these in public, to form associations, to protest and take
other political actions. Everyone should
be equal in the eyes of law. These
rights must be protected by an independent.
Home Assignment.
a. Attempt the inside Questions/Answers
b. Understand by your own.
c. Learn them.
d. Keep eyes over figure.
e. Keep reading this chapter
---------------------
Chapter 2.What is Democracy. Why Democracy?
Day5.Period 5.Page 30-31.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Terms
Persons.
Understandings Page.30.
Persons.
Understandings Page.30.
A judiciary whose orders are obeyed by everyone. We shall read more about these rights in
Chapter Six. Like, there are some
conditions that apply to the way a government is run after the elections. A democratic government cannot do whatever it
likes, simply because it has won an election.
It has to respect some basic rules.
In particular it has to respect some guarantees to the minorities. Every major decision has to through series of
consultations. Every office bearer has
certain rights and responsibilities assigned by the constitution and the
law. Each of these is accountable not
only to the people but also to other independent officers. We shall read more about this in Chapter
Five. Both these aspects give us the
fourth and final feature of democracy: a democratic government rules within
limits set by constitutional law and citizens' rights.
Read the Cartoon : Chinese government blocked free flow of information on the internet by placing restrictions on popular websites like Google and Yahoo. The image of tanks and unarmed student reminds the reader of another major event in recent Chinese history. Find about that event.
Summary definition Let us sum up the discussion so far: We
started with a simple definition that democracy is a form of government in
which the rulers are elected by the people.
We found that this definition was not sufficient unless we explained
some of the key words used in it.
Through a series of examples we worked out four features of democracy as
form of government. Accordingly,
democracy is a form of government in which: Rulers elected by the people take
all the major decisions; Elections offer
a choice and fair opportunity to the people to change the current rulers; This choice and opportunity is available to
all the people on an equal basis; and
the exercise of this choice leads to a government limited by basic rules of the
constitution and citizens' rights.
Understandings Page.31.
2.3 WHY DEMOCRACY? An
argument broke out in Madam Lyngdoh's class.
She had finished teaching the previous section on what is democracy and
asked the students if they thought democracy was the best form of government. Everyone had something to say. Debating merits of democracy
Yolanda : We live
in a democratic country. We read in the
last chapter that all over the world people want democracy, countries that were
not demo cratic earlier are becoming democratic now. All great people have said nice things about
democ racy. Isn't it obvious that
democracy is the best? Do we need to
debate this?
Tangkini : But Lyngdoh Madam
had said we should not accept something just because it is farnous, just
because everyone else accepts it. Isn't
it possible that everyone is following a wrong path?
Jeni : Yes, it actually is a wrong path. What has democracy brought to our
country? More than half a century of
democracy and there is so much poverty in the country.
Ribiang : But what has democracy got to do
with it? Do we have poverty because we
are demo cratic or do we have poverty despite being a democracy?
Jeni : Whatever, how does it make a difference? The point is that this cannot be the best
form of government. Democracy is all
about chaos, in stability, corruption and hypocrisy. Politicians fight among themselves. Who cares for the country?
Poimon : So, what should we have instead? Go back to the British rule? Invite some kings to rule this country?
Rose : I don't know. I think what this country needs is a strong
leader, someone who does not have to bother about elections and parliament. One leader should have all the powers. He should be able to do whatever is needed in
national interest. That alone can remove
corruption and poverty from this country.
Someone shouted : That is called dictatorship!
Hoi : What if that person starts using all
these powers for himself and his family?
What if he is corrupt himself?
Rose: I am speaking only of the honest, sincere and strong leader. Hoi: But that is not a fair. You are comparing a real democracy with an
ideal dictatorship. We should compare an
ideal with an ideal, the real with the real.
Go and check the record of dic tators in real life. They are most corrupt, selfish and
brutal. It is just that we don't get to
know about this. And what is worse, you
can't even get rid of them.
Home Assignment.
a. Attempt the inside Questions/Answers
b. Understand by your own.
c. Learn them.
d. Keep eyes over figure.
---------------------
Chapter 2.What is Democracy. Why Democracy?
Day6.Period 6.Page 31-32.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Terms
Persons.
Persons.
Understandings Page.31.
Madam Lyngdoh was listening to this discussion with
interest. Now she stepped in: "I
was delighted to see you all arguing so passionately. I don't know who is right
and who is wrong. That is for you to settle. But I did feel that you all wanted
to speak your mind. You may have felt
very bad if someone tried to stop you or if someone punished you for saying
what you felt. Would you be able to do that in a country that is not
democràtic? Is that a good argument for democracy?
Arguments against democracy
This conversation has most of
the arguments that we routinely hear against democracy. Let us go over some of
these arguments: Leaders keep changing in a democracy. This leads to
instability. Democracy is all about political competition and power play. There
is no scope for morality. So many people
have to be consulted in a democracy that it leads to delays. Elected leaders do
not know the best interest of the people. It leads to bad decisions. Democracy
leads to corruption for it is based on electoral competition. Ordinary people don't know what is good for them; they should not decide anything are there
some / other arguments against democracy that you can think of? Which of these arguments applies mainly to
democracy? Which of these can apply to
misuse of any form of government? Which
of these do you agree with? Clearly,
democracy is not a magical solution for all the problems. It has not ended poverty in our country and
in other parts of the world. Democracy,
as a form of
government only ensures that people take their own
decisions. This does not guarantee that
their decisions will be good. People can
make mistakes. Involving the people in
these decisions does lead to delays in decision making. It is also true that democracy leads to frequenti
leadership sometimes this can set back big decisions and effect the arguments
show that democracy of the kind we may not be the ideal form of government but
that is not a questions we face in real life.
The real question we face is different is democracy better than other
forms of governments that are there for us to choose from?
Arguments for democracy China's famine of
1958–1961 was the worst recorded famine in world history. Nearly three crore people died in this
famine. During those days, India's
economic condition was not much better than China, yet India did not have a
famine of the kind China had. Economists
think that this was a result of different government policies in
the two countries.
Read the Cartoon The Cartoon is from Brazil,a country that has long experience of dictatorship.It is entitled 'The Hidden Side of dictatorship 'Which hidden sides does this cartoon depict? Is it necessary for every dictatorship to have a hidden side? Find this about the dictators discussed i the first chapter and if possible,about Abacha in Nigeria and Marcos in Philpines.
Understandings Page 33. The existence of
democracy in India made the Indian government respond to food scarcity in a way
that the Chinese government did not.
They point out that no large scale famine has ever taken place in an
independent and democratic country. If
China too had multi party elections, an opposition party and a press free to
criticize the government, then so many people may not have died in the
famine. This example brings out one of
the reason why democracy is considered the best form of government. Democracy is better than any other form of
government in responding to the needs of the people. A non democratic government may and can
respond to the peoples needs, but it all depends on the wishes of the people
who rule. If the rulers don't want to,
they don't have to act according to the wishes of the people. A democracy requires that the rulers have to
attend to the needs of the people. A
democratic government is a better government because it is a more accountable
form of government there is another reason why democracy should lead to better
decisions than any non-democratic government.
Democracy is based on consultation and discussion. A democratic decision always involves many
persons, discussions and meetings. When
a number of people put their head together, they are able to point out possible
mistakes in any decision. This takes
time. But there is a big advantage in
taking time over important decisions.
This reduces the chances of rash or irresponsible decisions. Thus democracy improves the quality of
decision making.
This is related to the third argument. Democracy provides a method to deal with
differences and conflicts. In any
society people are bound to have differences of opinions and interests. These differences are particularly sharp in a
country like ours which has an amazing social diversity. People belong to different regions, speak
different languages, practice different religions and have different
castes. They look at the world very
differently and have different preferences.
The preference of one group can clash with those of other groups. How do we resolve such a conflict? The conflict can be solved by brutal
power. Whichever group is more powerful
will dictate its terms and others will have to accept that. But that would lead to resentment and
unhappiness. Different groups may not be
able to live together for long in such a way.
Democracy provides the only peaceful solution to this problem. In democracy, no one is a permanent
winner. No one is a permanent
loser. Different groups can live with
one another peacefully. In a diverse
country like India, democracy keeps our country together. These three arguments were about the effects
of democracy on the quality of government and social life. But the strongest argument for democracy is a
not about what democracy does to the government. It is about what democracy does to the
citizens. Even if democracy does not
bring about better decisions and accountable government, it is still better
than other forms of government.
Democracy enhances the dignity of citizens. As we discussed above, democracy is based on
the principle of political equality, on recognizing that the poorest and the least educated has the same status as the rich and the educated.
Home Assignment.
a. Attempt the inside Questions/Answers
b. Understand by your own.
c. Learn them.
d. Keep eyes over figure.
---------------------
Chapter 2.What is Democracy.Why Democracy?
Day 7.Period 7.Page 34-35.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Terms
Persons.
Persons.
Understandings Page.34.
People are not
subjects of a ruler, they are the rulers themselves. Even when they make mistakes, they are
responsible for their conduct.
Finally,
democracy is better than other forms of government because it allows us to
correct its own mistakes. As we saw
above, there is no guarantee that mistakes cannot be made in democracy. No form of government can guarantee
that. The advantage in a democracy is
that such mistakes cannot be hidden for long.
There is a space for public discussion on these mistakes. And there is a room for correction.
Either the rulers have to change their decisions, or the rulers can
be changed. This cannot happen in a non
- democratic government. Let us sum it
up. Democracy cannot get us everything
and is not the solution to all problems.
But it is clearly better than any other alternative that we know. It offers better chances of a good decision,
it is likely to respect people's own wishes and allows different kinds of
people to live together. Even when it
fails to do some of these things, it allows a way of correcting its mistakes
and offers more dignity to all citizens.That is why democracy is considered the best form of government.
Read the Cartoon : This cartoon was published in Canada just before its parliamentary elections of 2005.Everyone ,including the cartoonist, expected the liberal party to win once again. When the results came the Liberal Party lost the elections. Is this cartoon an argument against democracy or for democracy.
Check Your Progress Rajesh and Muzaffar read an article. It showed that no democracy has ever gone to war with another democracy. The article said that this was a great merit of democracy. After reading the essay ,Rajesh and Muzaffar had different reactions. Rajesh said that this was not a good argument for democracy. It was just a matter of chance. It is possible that in future democracies may have wars. Muzzafar said that it could not be a matter of chance. Democracies takes decisions in such a way that it reduces the chances of war. Which of two positions do you agree with and why?
Understandings Page 35.
2.4 BROADER MEANINGS OF DEMOCRACY : In this chapter we have considered the
meaning of democracy in a limited and descriptive sense. We have understood democracy as a form of
government. This way of defining
democracy helps us to identify a clear set of minimal features that a democracy
must have. The most common form that
democracy takes in our times is that of a representative democracy. You have already read about this in the
previous classes. In the countries we
call democracy, all the people do not rule.
A majority is allowed to take decisions on behalf of all the
people. Even the majority does not rule
directly. The majority of people rule through their elected representatives. This became necessary because:
a. Modern democracies
involve such a large number of people that it is physically impossible for them
to sit together and take a collective decision.
b.Even if they could, the citizen does not have the time, the desire or
the skills to take part in alļ the decisions.
This gives us a clear but minimal understanding of democracy. This clarity helps us to distinguish
democracies from non-democracies. But it
does not allow us to distinguish between a democracy and a good democracy. It does not allow us to see the operation of democracy beyond
government. Read the Cartoon : The famous cartoon by R K Laxman comments on the celebrations of the fifty years of independence. How many images on the wall do you recognise ? Do many common people feel the way the common man in this cartoon does.
Home Assignment.
a. Attempt the inside Questions/Answers
b. Understand by your own.
c. Learn them.
d. Keep eyes over figure.
---------------------
Chapter 2.What is Democracy. Why Democracy?
Day 8.Period 8.Page 36-37.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Topic : Why is Democracy.
Terms
Persons.
Persons.
Understandings Page.36.
For this we need to turn to
broader meanings of democracy. Sometimes
we use democracy for organizations other than the government. Just read these statements: "We are a
very democratic family. Whenever a decision has to be taken, we all sit down
and arrive at a consensus. My opinion matters as much as my father's."
"I don't like teachers who do not
allow students to speak and ask questions in the class. I would like to have
teachers with democratic temperament. "One leader and his family members
decide everything in this party. How can
they talk of democracy? "These ways
of using the word democracy go back to its basic sense of a method of taking
decisions. A democratic decision involves consultation with and consent of all
those who are affected by that decision. Those who are not powerful have the
same say in taking the decision as those
who are powerful. This can apply to a government or a family or any other
organization. Thus democracy is also a principle that can be applied to any
sphere of life. Sometimes we use the word democracy not to describe any
existing government but to set up an
ideal standard that democracies must aim to become: "True democracy will
come to this country only when no one goes hungry to bed," "In a
democracy every citizen must be able to play equal role in decision
making." For this you don't need
just an equal right to vote. Every
citizen needs to have equal information, basic education, equal resources and a
lot of commitment.
If we take these ideals seriously, then no country in the
world is a democracy. Yet an
understanding of democracy as an ideal reminds us of why we value
democracy. It enables us to judge an
existing democracy and identify its weaknesses.
It helps us to distinguish between a minimal democracy and a good
democracy. In this book we do not deal
much with this expanded notion of democracy.
Our focus here is with some core institutional features of democracy as
a form of government. Next year you will
read more about a democratic society and ways of evaluating our democracy. At this stage we just need to note that
democracy can apply to many spheres of life and that democracy can take many
forms. There can be various ways of
taking decisions in a democratic manner, as long as the basic principle of
consultation on an equal basis is accepted.
The most common form of democracy in todays world is rule through
people's elected representatives. We
shall read more about that in Chapter Four.
But if the community is small, there can be other ways of taking
democratic decisions. All the people can
sit together and take decisions directly.
This is how Gram Sabha should work in a village. Can you think of some other democratic ways
of decision making?
In my village the Gram Sabha never meets .Is that democratic?
Activity : Find out the total number of eligible voters in your assembly constituency and your parliamentary constituency. Find out how many people can fit into the largest stadium in your area. Is it possible for all the voters in your parliamentary or assembly constituency to sit together and have a meaningful discussion.
Understandings Page.37. a This also means that no country is a perfect
democracy. The features of democracy
that we discussed in this chapter provide only the minimum conditions of
democracy. That does not make it ideal
democracy. Every democracy has to try to
realize the ideals of a democratic decision making. This cannot be achieved once and for
all. This requires a constant effort to
save and strengthen democratic forms of decision making. What we do as citizens can make a difference
to making our country more or less democratic.
This is the strength and information the weakness of democracy: the fate of the country depends
not just on what the rulers do, but mainly on what we, as citizens, do.
This is what distinguished democracy from
other governments. Other forms of government
like monarchy, dictatorship or one - party rule do not require all citizens to
take part in politics. In fact most non
democratic governments would like citizens not to take part in politics. But democracy depends on active political
participation by all the citizens. That
is why a study of democracy must focus democratic politics.
Home Assignment.
a. Attempt the inside Questions/Answers
b. Understand by your own.
c. Learn them.
d. Keep eyes over figure.
---------------------
Good
ReplyDeleteIt is very informative
ReplyDeleteSir.meeting room id kya hai zoom par
ReplyDeleteAapka kya hai sir room id zoom pe
ReplyDeleteVery helpful Sir
ReplyDelete